32 vs 43 Inch TV: Size Comparison to Scale

A 43-inch TV has 81% more screen area than a 32-inch one. Side by side, that's 24.4 cm more width and 13.7 cm more height. The picture below shows both screens in true relative scale.

70.8 cm95.2 cm39.8 cm53.5 cmΔS = +81%

Both screens drawn to the same scale, aligned at the bottom-left corner.

Parameter32″ cm32″ in43″ cm43″ inΔ
Width70.8 cm27.9 in95.2 cm37.5 in+34%
Height39.8 cm15.7 in53.5 cm21.1 in+34%
Area2823 cm²438 in²5097 cm²790 in²+81%

The difference in numbers

The 43″ screen is 24.4 cm wider (+34%) and 13.7 cm taller (+34%) than the 32″ screen. You would need about 1.8 screens of 32″ to cover the area of one 43″ screen.

Recommended viewing distance

32″: 0.97 m – 1.32 m (3.2 ft – 4.3 ft)
43″: 1.31 m – 1.78 m (4.3 ft – 5.8 ft)

Customize this comparison →

Questions about 32″ vs 43″

Is 43″ worth it over 32″?

Yes if you want noticeably more picture: the 43″ has 81% more screen area than the 32″. Whether it's worth it comes down to budget and how far you sit.

Will the picture quality change?

Picture quality depends on resolution and panel, not size — a larger screen just spreads the same pixel count over more area, so pixel density drops unless you also step up in resolution.

Do these sizes include the bezel?

No — both figures are for the visible screen only; real cabinets run a few centimetres larger on each side depending on the model.